Case 2300279/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Natasha Lomotey v Mitie Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300279/2021
- Decision date
- 2 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Natasha Lomotey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal gave judgment that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
The parties had agreed settlement terms under which the respondent would pay the claimant £12,000 as compensation for unfair dismissal by 2 October 2022. By consent, the proceedings were adjourned for implementation of those terms, with liberty to apply by that date.
The judgment recorded that unless an application was made by 2 October 2022, the claimant consented to the claim form being treated as withdrawn and dismissed with effect from that date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. Settlement terms were agreed for a compensation payment for unfair dismissal of £12,000, with the proceedings adjourned for implementation and the claim to be treated as withdrawn and dismissed unless an application was made by 2 October 2022. | Upheld | — | £12,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,000
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £12,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.