Employment tribunal cases against Mitie Limited

Since 2017, Mitie Limited has appeared as a respondent in 158 employment tribunal cases, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Companies House number: 02938041
Status: Active
SIC codes: 82990

Total cases: 158
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

18 distinct categories

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	95
02	Unlawful deduction from wages	59
03	Breach of contract	46
04	Disability discrimination	34
05	Working time regulations	31
06	Race discrimination	25
07	Whistleblowing	18
08	Redundancy	16
09	Sex discrimination	13
10	Age discrimination	10
11	Religion or belief discrimination	6
12	Other	4
13	Trade union	4
14	Victimisation	3
15	Pregnancy and maternity discrimination	3
16	Equal pay	2
17

All cases

160 cases · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
3322321/2019	30 April 2026	England & Wales	Mr S Hussain	Unlawful deduction from wages, Other	—
4107665/2021	30 April 2026	Scotland	—	Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
3327517/2019	27 April 2026	England & Wales	Mr FS Junior	Unfair dismissal	—
3334834/2018	26 April 2026	England & Wales	Mr D Cox	Unfair dismissal	—
2301230/2023	25 April 2026	England & Wales	(1) Miss E Kalasauskaite (2) Mrs. S Appleby	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal	—
6017671/2024	9 March 2026	England & Wales	Mr C Kemajou	Age discrimination, Disability discrimination, Race discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
6016567/2024	7 February 2026	England & Wales	Mr Anthony O’Connor	Breach of contract, Whistleblowing, Race discrimination, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
6013342/2024	3 December 2025	England & Wales	Mrs Adiela Barnes	Age discrimination, Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Whistleblowing, Sex discrimination, Unfair dismissal

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.