Case 2300291/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Restore (Cumbria) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300291/2022
- Decision date
- 11 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Kevin Wakefield, presented the claim on 27 January 2022. Case management orders and a notice of hearing were sent on 25 February 2022. The tribunal later wrote to the claimant on 15 June 2022 asking him to confirm the respondent's correct name, and on 14 July 2022 notifying him that strike out was being considered because he had not complied with the case management orders and his case did not appear to be actively pursued.
The respondent applied on 6 May 2022 for strike out or an unless order on the same grounds. The claimant did not reply to the tribunal's letters. The tribunal concluded that it was apparent the claimant was not actively pursuing his claim and therefore struck it out. The judgment records that the claim was struck out and dismissed, and that the hearing listed for 28 October 2022 was vacated. The tribunal also amended the respondent's name to Restore plc.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had not complied with case management orders and was not actively pursuing the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.