Case 2300331/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Delroy Downer v London Borough of Lewisham — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300331/2019
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Panel members
- Mrs C Wickersham, Ms N Beeston
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Delroy Downer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a Black Caribbean Crime Enforcement Regulation Officer employed by the respondent, alleged direct race discrimination arising from the respondent's investigation and disciplinary process after an incident at Little Nan's Bar in December 2017. The tribunal accepted that the alleged acts formed a continuing course of conduct ending with the appeal outcome, so the complaints were in time.
The tribunal considered allegations that Ms Hooper targeted the claimant during the investigation, including by referring to alcohol, saying his account was not reliable, altering notes or evidence, preventing him from taking notes, ignoring supportive evidence, and recommending disciplinary action. It found that some alleged acts did not happen, that notes and evidence had not been tampered with, and that where treatment occurred the respondent had non-discriminatory explanations based on the evidence gathered and the differing accounts of the incident.
The tribunal also considered the decisions by Mr Wilkinson to find misconduct and issue a final written warning, and by Ms Buckton to uphold the misconduct finding while reducing the sanction to a written warning. It found no evidence that a white officer in the same circumstances would have been treated differently, and no evidence from which it was appropriate to infer conscious or unconscious race discrimination. The complaints were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal found the complaints of direct race discrimination unfounded and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Hendricks v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Igen Ltd v Wong
- Madarassy v Nomura International plc
- Qureshi v Victoria University of Manchester
- Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
- Warner v Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office
- Home Office (UK Visas & Immigration) v Kuranchie
- West Midlands Passenger Transport Executive v Singh
- Nagarajan v London Regional Transport
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.