Case 2300483/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Rendall and Rittner — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300483/2019
- Decision date
- 6 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Preliminary
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held on 6 September 2019 at London South Employment Tribunal, Employment Judge K Andrews recorded that Mr T Jezioranski appeared in person and Rendall & Rittner Ltd was represented by Mr T Fuller, Consultant.
The judgment states that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. It does not set out findings on the merits of any unfair dismissal, breach of contract, redundancy, race discrimination, religion or belief discrimination, unlawful deduction from wages, or working time complaint, and it records no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; the specific claim types are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; the specific claim types are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states only that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; the specific claim types are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states only that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; the specific claim types are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states only that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; the specific claim types are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.