Case 2300498/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Adelanwa v Environment Agency — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300498/2023
- Decision date
- 19 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal JUDGMENT
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Adelanwa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dyal struck out the listed complaints of direct race discrimination and the listed complaints of harassment related to race. The judgment records that these complaints were subject to a deposit order under rule 39 and that the Claimant chose not to pay the deposits.
The deposit orders in issue were made by Employment Judge Aspinall on 1 May 2024 and corrected on 19 May 2024. The judgment does not determine any remedy, because it is limited to the strike-out of the complaints identified in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment struck out the listed complaints of direct race discrimination at paragraph 1. The references given were 2.2/97.1.1, 2.3/97.4.2, 2.4/97.1.2, 2.5/97.1.3, 2.6/97.1.1, 2.9/97.4.4, 2.10/97.1.3 and 2.11/97.1.4. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment struck out the listed complaints of harassment related to race at paragraph 2. The references given were 4.1/97.5.1, 4.3/97.5.3, 4.4/97.5.4 and 4.5/97.5.5. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.