Case 2300597/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Osagiede v CIS Security Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300597/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Osagiede
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Khalil sat alone at London South on 2 March 2020. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Plant, HR Director. The judgment records that the parties had reached private terms of settlement before the judgment was issued.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims following the claimant's withdrawal. No findings were made on the merits of the pleaded claims and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed by the tribunal following the claimant's withdrawal after private terms of settlement were reached. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed by the tribunal following the claimant's withdrawal after private terms of settlement were reached. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed by the tribunal following the claimant's withdrawal after private terms of settlement were reached. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed by the tribunal following the claimant's withdrawal after private terms of settlement were reached. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.