Case 2300721/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hewitt v London & Quadrant Housing Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300721/2021
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hewitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records that, by letter dated 23 May 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr A Hewitt an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's Order dated 1 December 2021 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not occur. The claim was therefore struck out. The hearings fixed for 16 September 2022 and 04-07 July 2023 were cancelled. No remedy was awarded or assessed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim is struck out but does not set out the pleaded causes of action; this classification follows the supplied listing category/hint. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out but does not set out the pleaded discrimination allegation; this classification follows the supplied listing category/hint. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.