Case 2300833/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Hendrych v Sky UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300833/2021
- Decision date
- 21 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Hendrych
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had previously written to the claimant on 21 April 2022 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 2 February 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations within the stipulated time, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The hearing listed for 5 May 2022 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out. It does not set out claim-specific particulars in the reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was struck out. It does not set out claim-specific particulars in the reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck out. It does not set out claim-specific particulars in the reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim was struck out. It does not set out claim-specific particulars in the reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.