Case 2300840/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Dahri v Profile Security Services Limited and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300840/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
- Panel members
- Mrs N Christofi, Mr N Shanks
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr K Dahri
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's automatically unfair dismissal claim against R1 under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996. It also dismissed the protected disclosure detriment claims against R2 and R3.
The tribunal found the ordinary unfair dismissal claim against R1 to be well founded and it succeeded. However, both the basic award and compensatory award were reduced by 100% on account of the claimant's conduct, resulting in nil compensation.
The tribunal dismissed the race discrimination claims against R2 and R3 and dismissed the wrongful dismissal claim against R1, finding those claims were not well founded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Automatically unfair dismissal claim against R1 pursuant to section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Ordinary unfair dismissal claim against R1 was well founded and succeeded, but both the basic award and compensatory award were reduced by 100% on account of the claimant's conduct, so compensation was nil. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Race discrimination | Race discrimination claims against R2 and R3 were not well founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Whistleblowing | Protected disclosure detriment claims against R2 and R3 were not well founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Wrongful dismissal claim against R1 was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.