Case 2300967/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Taha Ahmed v Asda Stores Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300967/2022
- Decision date
- 13 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Taha Ahmed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claims following the claimant's non-compliance with the Tribunal's Unless Orders sent on 14 December 2022.
The hearing listed for 19 January 2023 was vacated. The judgment gives no further findings on the factual or legal merits of the underlying claims and makes no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the claims under Rule 38 for non-compliance with Unless Orders. The short judgment does not separately identify this claim type; classification follows the case listing categories supplied in Layer 1. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claims under Rule 38 for non-compliance with Unless Orders. The short judgment does not separately identify this claim type; classification follows the case listing categories supplied in Layer 1. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claims under Rule 38 for non-compliance with Unless Orders. The short judgment does not separately identify this claim type; classification follows the case listing categories supplied in Layer 1. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claims under Rule 38 for non-compliance with Unless Orders. The short judgment does not separately identify this claim type; classification follows the case listing categories supplied in Layer 1. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claims under Rule 38 for non-compliance with Unless Orders. The short judgment does not separately identify this claim type; classification follows the case listing categories supplied in Layer 1; the listing category also refers to transexualism, but the judgment itself gives no separate detail. |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38
- Unless Orders
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.