Case 2300977/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Mr J Danquah v FDM Group Ltd — 2025

Case reference: 2300977/2023
Decision date: 1 August 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Leith
Panel members: Miss Bharadia, Mrs Beeston

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Danquah

Respondent

FDM Group Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard at Croydon via CVP on 16 to 27 June 2025 before Employment Judge Leith, Miss Bharadia and Mrs Beeston. The tribunal recorded that Mr Danquah did not have a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times. It then dismissed the claims listed in the judgment: automatically unfair dismissal, protected disclosure detriment, discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, direct sex discrimination, harassment related to sex, direct religion and belief discrimination, harassment related to religion and belief, direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, and victimisation.

The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record. No monetary award is recorded because all claims were dismissed.

Claims and outcomes

11 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Recorded in the judgment as automatically unfair dismissal.	Dismissed	—	—
Whistleblowing	Recorded in the judgment as protected disclosure detriment.	Dismissed	—	—
Disability discrimination	The tribunal found that the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	The tribunal found that the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Sex discrimination	Recorded from the judgment.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Harassment	Harassment related to sex.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Religion or belief discrimination	Recorded from the judgment.	Dismissed	Religion or belief	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.