Case 2300987/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300987/2021
- Decision date
- 21 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms J Forecast, Mr K Murphy
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at London South, constituted by Employment Judge Heath with lay members Ms J Forecast and Mr K Murphy, found one complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. That finding was confined to the claimant's role as company secretary, and the respondent was ordered to pay £250, described as the gross sum deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The written judgment records that a number of claims were withdrawn and therefore dismissed, including specified direct sex discrimination claims, direct discrimination on grounds of religion or belief, one sexual or sex-related harassment claim, harassment on grounds of religion or belief, and identified victimisation claims. It also records that the remaining claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, direct sex discrimination, sexual or sex-related harassment, victimisation, holiday pay and unauthorised deduction from wages were found not well-founded and dismissed.
The judgment is a short record of outcome and does not set out fuller reasons beyond those dispositions. The only monetary award recorded is the £250 deduction award.
Claims and outcomes
13 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint upheld only in respect of the claimant's role as company secretary; the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction on termination of employment on 11 March 2021. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Any remaining unauthorised deduction claim was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claims 5.2.1, 5.2.3 and 5.2.5 were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Remaining direct sex discrimination claims were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | All direct discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief claims (5.2.6 to 5.2.10) were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | Claim 6.1.8, described as sexual or sex-related harassment, was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.