Case 2301001/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Gyane of Counsel For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301001/2020
- Decision date
- 3 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
- Panel members
- Mrs S Dengate, Mr S Townsend
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms N Gyane of Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in London South by CVP before Employment Judge Truscott QC, Mrs S Dengate and Mr S Townsend. In its unanimous judgment dated 3 June 2021, it rejected the claimant’s claims of direct sex discrimination, direct age discrimination, and harassment related to both sex and age.
The judgment states that the direct sex discrimination claim under sections 11 and 13 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and was dismissed. It also states that the direct age discrimination claim under sections 5 and 13 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal likewise dismissed the harassment claims. The claim of harassment related to sex under sections 11 and 26 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded, and the claim of harassment related to age under sections 5 and 26 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded.
No monetary remedy or award is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination under sections 11 and 13 Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination under sections 5 and 13 Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to sex under sections 11 and 26 Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to age under sections 5 and 26 Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- sections 11 and 13 Equality Act 2010
- sections 5 and 13 Equality Act 2010
- sections 11 and 26 Equality Act 2010
- sections 5 and 26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.