Case 2301156/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Miah v WH Smith Retail Holdings Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301156/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Perry Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Miah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Miah brought a claim of unfair dismissal against WH Smith Retail Holdings Limited. The hearing took place by CVP at London South Employment Tribunal on 8 December 2022 before Employment Judge T Perry.
The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim because it had been presented outside the time limits in section 111(2)(a) and (b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment form.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim because it was presented outside the time limits in section 111(2)(a) and (b) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 111(2)(a) and (b) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.