Case 2301171/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr G Hine, Solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301171/2018
- Decision date
- 21 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 21 January 2021, sitting at London South before Employment Judge K Andrews, the tribunal heard the case with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr G Hine, solicitor. The written judgment is a short threshold decision rather than a merits judgment.
The tribunal held that the claimant did not have any employment or other status upon which to bring her claims against the respondent. On that basis, the claims were dismissed. The judgment does not set out separate findings on the substance of the individual claims or any liability analysis.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment does not record any compensation or other monetary order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment does not set out separate findings on the merits of this claim; it records only that the claimant had no employment or other status to bring her claims. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The written judgment does not set out separate findings on the merits of this claim; it records only that the claimant had no employment or other status to bring her claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.