Case 2301174/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Rendall and Rittner — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301174/2020
- Decision date
- 4 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr O Olojo's claim against Rendall and Rittner Limited. The judgment does not identify the substantive legal basis of the claim in the extracted text; it records only that the claim was struck out.
The reasons given were procedural. The claimant had been notified of a preliminary hearing on 25 October 2021 but did not attend and gave no prior explanation. Orders sent on 27 October 2021 required the claimant to provide specified information to the Tribunal and respondent by 22 November 2021, but he did not do so.
After the respondent brought the non-compliance to the Tribunal's attention, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 6 January 2022 warning that strike out was being considered because he had not complied with the order and the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was invited to object in writing or request a hearing within 28 days, but there was no further contact from him. The Tribunal found that the claimant was not actively pursuing the claim, struck it out, and vacated the hearing listed for 23 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that 'the claim' was struck out but does not identify the substantive legal claim in the extracted judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.