Case 2301196/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Lucas v Medway NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301196/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
- Panel members
- Mr A Fairbank, Mr J Turley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Lucas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London South (Croydon) before Employment Judge Wright with Mr A Fairbank and Mr J Turley, unanimously dismissed both claims. The judgment states that the claimant's claim of unlawful discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010 and her claim of unfair dismissal contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996 were not well-founded, failed, and were dismissed.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasons because it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons are provided in the decision record, so the judgment itself contains only the final outcome and not the tribunal's full reasoning on liability.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The decision is confined to dismissal of the discrimination and unfair dismissal claims, with no separate remedy findings or compensation figure stated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment does not specify the particular Equality Act 2010 complaint beyond referring to 'unlawful discrimination'; the case listing category indicates disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.