Case 2301217/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Garry v Offset Architects Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301217/2023
- Decision date
- 28 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Garry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at London South by CVP on 28 February 2024, Employment Judge Ramsden determined a preliminary issue for Ms H Garry v Offset Architects Limited. The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaints of harassment related to sex and sexual harassment were in time.
The tribunal also found that it was just and equitable for proceedings relating to those complaints to be brought. No substantive findings on liability were made in this judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
The judgment recorded that these complaints, together with the claimant’s other complaints, would proceed to a hearing listed to start on 24 June 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Preliminary issue only: the complaint of harassment related to sex was found to be in time and allowed to proceed. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Preliminary issue only: the complaint of sexual harassment was found to be in time and allowed to proceed. | Upheld | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.