Case 2301233/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Stephanie Riste v Surrey and Sussex healthcare NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301233/2021
- Decision date
- 30 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rahman
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Stephanie Riste
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant resigned from her role as a medical secretary and alleged that the respondent had committed a cumulative breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, including through workload pressures, lack of support, handling of grievances, redeployment issues and the occupational health referral process.
The tribunal found that the grievance investigation was handled thoroughly and professionally, that the claimant's evidence was not disregarded, and that the report gave sufficient reasons for the decision reached. It also found that the claimant had not been denied redeployment, but had been placed on the redeployment register and told she would need to apply and interview for roles.
The tribunal found that the occupational health referral and workload-management steps did not amount to a breach of contract. It concluded that the respondent had not behaved in a way calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage trust and confidence, and therefore the claimant had not established that she was dismissed. The unfair dismissal claim was rejected.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The remaining claim was constructive unfair dismissal. Earlier age discrimination and harassment claims were mentioned as having been struck out in March 2022, but they were not adjudicated in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- Malik v BCCI SA
- Buckland v Bournemouth University Higher Education Corporation
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores Limited v Burchell
- range of reasonable responses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.