Case 2301254/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Chirita v Healthcare Homes Group Limited, — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301254/2022
- Decision date
- 7 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Chirita
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing in London South on 7 May 2024, Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer considered the claimant's claims against Healthcare Homes (LSC) Limited. The claim list included unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, direct race discrimination, and harassment relating to race.
The tribunal struck out all four claims because they had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment records that none of the claimant's claims survived the preliminary hearing, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out at a public preliminary hearing because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Struck out at a public preliminary hearing because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The direct race discrimination claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Harassment | The harassment claim relating to race was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.