Case 2301273/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bofarull Guix v Asda Stores Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301273/2019
- Decision date
- 22 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bofarull Guix
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to comply with the terms of an unless order made on 8 June 2020 and sent to the parties on 22 June 2020.
The judgment records that all claims were struck out as of 6 July 2020, described as the date of compliance. The hearing listed for 25-26 January 2021 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all claims were struck out; the specific claim type is identified from the listing category rather than separately enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that all claims were struck out; the specific claim type is identified from the listing category rather than separately enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that all claims were struck out; the specific claim type is identified from the Public Interest Disclosure listing category rather than separately enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all claims were struck out; the specific claim type is identified from the listing category rather than separately enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all claims were struck out; the specific claim type is identified from the Working Time Regulations listing category rather than separately enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.