Case 2301367/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Zborowski v Mitie Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301367/2021
- Decision date
- 5 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Zborowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave a judgment on strike out following a hearing at London South by video on 27 March 2023. It struck out specified claims under Rule 37(1)(a) on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success, particularly having regard to the statutory time limit for bringing such claims.
The claims struck out were the race discrimination claims other than direct race discrimination in relation to dismissal, the disability discrimination claims other than failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to dismissal, and the holiday pay claim. The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims will proceed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Race discrimination claims were struck out, except for the claim for direct race discrimination in relation to the claimant's dismissal, which was expressly left to proceed. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Disability discrimination claims were struck out, except for the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to the claimant's dismissal, which was expressly left to proceed. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(a)
- statutory time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.