Case 2301374/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Hichem Firjeni v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301374/2018
- Decision date
- 24 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell
- Panel members
- Ms S Khawaja, Mrs C Chaudhuri
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Hichem Firjeni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Firjeni was a trainee Prison Officer who failed Use of Force assessments during initial training. The tribunal accepted evidence that he had several attempts at the personal protection assessment and two attempts at the control and restraint assessment, received feedback, and did not meet the required standard. It found that the decision-maker's concern was his failure to acknowledge the seriousness of the assessment failures and the reasons for them.
On the harassment allegations, the tribunal did not accept that the specific word "knackerjack" had been used. It accepted that Mr Smith had made comments about Mr Firjeni looking like a sack of potatoes, carrying himself like a prison officer, jewellery, uniform and lateness, but found these were not out of the ordinary in the training context, were not related to race, and did not show racial motive or subconscious bias.
On direct race discrimination, the tribunal found that Officer A was not an appropriate comparator because his assessment failure was less serious and the surrounding circumstances differed. Considering a hypothetical comparator, it accepted that a white trainee who failed in the same way and showed the same lack of acknowledgement would also have been dismissed and not reassigned to an OSG role. The claims were therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Complaint of direct discrimination on grounds of race under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment on grounds of race under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 136 Equality Act 2010
- Ayodele v CityLink Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 1913
- Madarrassy v Nomura [2007] ICR 867
- section 123 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.