Case 2301374/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Harutunian v GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301374/2020
- Decision date
- 16 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms A Harutunian
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 15-16 December 2021 before Employment Judge Martin, the tribunal determined a single preliminary issue arising in the case: whether Ms A Harutunian was a disabled person for the purposes of s6 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal held that she was disabled within that statutory definition.
The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the end of the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was awarded or recorded in this judgment, and no other substantive claims were determined in the text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal held that the claimant is a disabled person as defined in s6 Equality Act 2010. Oral reasons were given at the conclusion of the hearing; written reasons were not provided unless requested within 14 days. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.