Case 2301389/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Knight v TC Facilities Management Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301389/2019
- Decision date
- 19 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hargrove Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Knight
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the Respondent had failed to file a response in time or at all. On that basis, in a Rule 21 judgment dated 19 August 2019, Employment Judge Hargrove adjudged the Claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal to be well-founded.
No remedy was determined in this judgment. Instead, the tribunal ordered the Claimant to set out in writing, by no later than 11 October 2019, the amount of the basic award and compensatory award claimed, and to state whether he had found alternative employment and, if so, when and at what rate of pay. The order stated that, upon receipt of that response, the file was to be placed before an Employment Judge for a further judgment on remedies.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment: the Respondent failed to file a response in time or at all, and the tribunal adjudged the unfair dismissal claim well-founded. No remedy was decided in this judgment; the claimant was ordered to provide information on basic and compensatory award and alternative employment for a further remedies judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.