Case 2301469/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Richard Allbury v London Borough of Southwark — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301469/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Richard Allbury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim concerned whether the claimant, a carpenter employed by the respondent, had been paid properly after implementation of the Southwark Trade and Craft Agreement 2021. The parties agreed the issue was whether his wages were paid in accordance with the collective agreement, including whether he had been correctly identified as a Craft Operative and whether there was a process to challenge that grading.
The tribunal found that the collective agreement had been properly implemented and applied to the claimant. His salary had been calculated by reference to the agreed assimilation formula, and his experience had been taken into account to the extent provided for by the collective agreement, which did not provide additional pay for experience beyond three years.
The tribunal found that the respondent had not taken reasonable steps before the hearing to bring to the claimant's attention the internal process introduced in August 2022 for challenging career grade assimilation. However, for the unauthorised deductions claim, the tribunal concluded it could not conduct the internal evaluation itself and that, as at the claim and hearing dates, the claimant had been paid properly at the Craft Operative grade. The claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the unauthorised deductions complaint was not well-founded. It also noted that an internal process existed to challenge the claimant's allocated career grade, but the claimant had not been notified of that process before the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- properly payable
- balance of probability
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.