Case 2301488/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S. Gillani v F.Q Contractors Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301488/2020
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms Mitchell, Ms MacDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S. Gillani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe corrected judgment records that Mr S. Gillani’s complaint of direct discrimination was not well founded and was dismissed. The judgment also records that his complaint of harassment was not well founded and was dismissed. In the extracted text, the tribunal does not set out further reasoning beyond those dispositional findings.
The tribunal upheld the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages and awarded £500. It also upheld the complaint of non-payment of holiday pay and awarded £780. No separate breakdown beyond those two sums is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
The remaining complaints, under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, were both found not well founded and dismissed. The corrected judgment is dated 23 March 2022 and is signed by Employment Judge T.R. Smith, with members Ms Mitchell and Ms MacDonald.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records this as a complaint of direct discrimination. Classified here as race discrimination in line with the case listing. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records a harassment complaint. The protected characteristic is treated as race in line with the case listing. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint well-founded and awarded £500. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the complaint well-founded and awarded £780 for non-payment of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £780 |
| Other | Complaint under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; no closer match exists in the locked taxonomy. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaint under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002; no closer match exists in the locked taxonomy. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,280
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.