Case 2301573/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K. Sullivan v London Borough of Croydon and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301573/2023
- Decision date
- 30 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCann Signed
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms K. Sullivan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal formally consolidated Ms Sullivan's claims with claims brought by Ms T.P. Seddon and Ms M.C. Otero Santiago. It also amended the respondent names so that the first respondent was London Borough of Croydon and the second respondent was Management Committee of Saffron Valley Collegiate.
All claims by the three claimants, including Ms Sullivan, against Jennifer Adamson were dismissed because she had been wrongly named as a respondent. In Ms Sullivan's case, the claim numbered 2301579/2023 against the first and second respondents was withdrawn and dismissed under rule 52.
For Case No. 2301573/2023, the complaint under section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 was withdrawn by Ms Sullivan and dismissed under rule 52. No remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 in Case No. 2301573/2023, concerning the right to be accompanied, was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.