Case 2301642/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Cocoon Global Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301642/2022
- Decision date
- 17 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coen
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Coen, sitting alone at London Central, determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 because no response to the claim had been presented. The claimant, Miss Zsanett Toth, succeeded on the claims and the tribunal ordered Cocoon Global Ltd to pay gross sums of £2,923.08 in respect of notice pay, £1,211.12 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages in February 2022, and £817.51 in respect of holiday accrued but not taken on termination.
The judgment states that the awards were made following termination of the claimant's employment in March 2022. It records that the figures are expressed as gross sums and that the respondent should make the appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance and account to the proper authorities, with payment of the net sum representing a valid discharge of the judgment. Written reasons were not to be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Award in respect of notice pay following termination of employment in March 2022; the judgment does not label the claim more specifically than 'notice pay'. | Upheld | — | £2,923 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in February 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,211 |
| Holiday pay | Award for holiday accrued but not taken on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £818 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,952
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.