Case 2301685/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mitie Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301685/2021
- Decision date
- 20 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent's correct name was agreed to be Mitie Limited and that the record would be corrected accordingly. The respondent's applications for strike out or for a Deposit Order were withdrawn at the hearing.
The claimant's only claim was for unpaid holiday. The tribunal held that the claim was not made out and dismissed it, with the case dismissed entirely.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes the claim as one for unpaid holiday and states it was not made out and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.