Case 2301761/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Lorraine Hamilton-Julien v Cygnet Health Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301761/2024
- Decision date
- 30 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell
- Panel members
- Mrs R Effeny, Mr D Rogers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Lorraine Hamilton-Julien
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a mental health nurse at Cygnet Maidstone, suffered a hamstring injury in January 2021 during PMVA (Physical Management of Violence and Aggression) restraint training and a wrist injury in November 2022. She was unable to complete the PMVA training course and from late 2022 was largely confined to administrative duties. She was dismissed on capability grounds in September 2023. The respondent accepted that her leg and wrist injuries amounted to a disability.
The tribunal held that the dismissal was fair and that the employer had taken reasonable steps to accommodate the claimant over a substantial period before reaching the capability decision. The discrimination arising from disability claim was dismissed on the same justification analysis, the tribunal applying the same standard of fairness. The reasonable adjustments claim was dismissed: the tribunal did not accept the third PCP regarding prolonged standing was made out, accepted that home working was no longer pursued, and found that the proposed adjustment for the PMVA requirement (continuing on light duties until training could be completed) was in substance what had happened.
The tribunal was critical of one aspect of the process, namely the dismissal without notice, which it said was wrong and should be reserved for cases of gross misconduct. It concluded this had been done through lack of experience rather than any intent to humiliate, and did not render the dismissal unfair. The wrongful dismissal complaint was dismissed on withdrawal because notice pay had since been paid.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; notice pay had been paid after the claim was brought. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal found the dismissal was fair. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability dismissed; the tribunal found the same balancing exercise as for unfair dismissal applied and there was no basis for the claim to succeed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments claim dismissed; the tribunal found the employer did all that was reasonable to accommodate the claimant's difficulties. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- O'Brien
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.