Case 2301898/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Francisca Holmes v Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301898/2021
- Decision date
- 11 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell
- Panel members
- Mr M Simon, Mr F Benson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Francisca Holmes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mrs Holmes's resignation did not amount to a constructive dismissal because there was no fundamental breach of contract by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust.
The tribunal dismissed the complaints of harassment on grounds of religion and discrimination on grounds of race or age. It also dismissed the protected disclosure detriment complaints, finding that the claimant did not suffer any detriment for raising concerns.
The complaint of automatically unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure was dismissed. The unlawful deduction from wages complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant's resignation did not amount to a constructive dismissal because there was no fundamental breach of contract by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment on grounds of religion was dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Race discrimination | The complaint of discrimination on grounds of race was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | The complaint of discrimination on grounds of age was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Whistleblowing | The complaints of detriments at work for making a protected disclosure were dismissed on the basis that the claimant did not suffer any detriment for raising concerns. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of automatically unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.