Case 2301901/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Ms R Thompson v Currys plc — 2026

Case reference: 2301901/2024
Decision date: 7 May 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Abbott Representation
Venue: London South

Indexed: 21 July 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms R Thompson

Respondent

Currys plc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claim was listed as including complaints of age discrimination, breach of contract, race discrimination, unfair dismissal and under the Working Time Regulations. At a video hearing on 7 May 2026, Employment Judge Abbott struck out all complaints in the claim under Rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because they had no reasonable prospect of success.

Full reasons were given orally at the hearing and are not set out in the written judgment. The written judgment does not distinguish between the individual complaints or record any monetary remedy.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	The written judgment does not identify this complaint separately; it states that all complaints in the claim were struck out.	Struck out	Age	—
Breach of contract	The written judgment does not identify this complaint separately; it states that all complaints in the claim were struck out.	Struck out	—	—
Race discrimination	The written judgment does not identify this complaint separately; it states that all complaints in the claim were struck out.	Struck out	Race	—
Unfair dismissal	The written judgment does not identify this complaint separately; it states that all complaints in the claim were struck out.	Struck out	—	—
Working time regulations	The written judgment does not identify this complaint separately; it states that all complaints in the claim were struck out.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.