Case 2301913/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Ogbonna v Brook Street (UK) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301913/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Ogbonna
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal noted that, following reconsideration of a preliminary hearing judgment on 27 January 2022, it ordered the claimant on 13 June 2022 to pay a deposit of £10.00. The order was sent to the claimant on 14 June 2022, but the deposit was not paid.
Because the deposit was not paid, the claim for detriment on the ground of a protected disclosure and the claim under section 19 Equality Act 2010 for indirect age discrimination were struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal recorded that the remaining claims were unaffected and would proceed, and it reduced the hearing listed for 4 to 6 January 2023 to one day.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim for detriment on the ground of a protected disclosure. Struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant did not pay the £10 deposit ordered on 13 June 2022 and sent on 14 June 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Indirect age discrimination claim under section 19 Equality Act 2010. Struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant did not pay the £10 deposit ordered on 13 June 2022 and sent on 14 June 2022. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.