Case 2301922/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J O’Shea v Health Education England — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301922/2019
- Decision date
- 11 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J O’Shea
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim by Miss J O’Shea against Health Education England was listed for a full hearing on 11 November 2019. The Respondent had not entered a response and did not attend the hearing. The Claimant also did not attend by the scheduled start time, did not contact the Tribunal to explain her absence, and did not respond to an answerphone message left by the Tribunal clerk.
After usual checks confirmed that the Claimant was not in the building, and with the Claimant still absent by 11 am, Employment Judge Tsamados dismissed the claim under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of any pleaded complaint and records no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claim under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the Claimant did not attend or contact the Tribunal; no substantive merits finding was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.