Case 2301974/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Pennington v Dunelm (soft furnishings) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301974/2018
- Decision date
- 6 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Pennington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Croydon on 18 December 2019 before Employment Judge Cheetham QC. The claimant was Mrs D Pennington and the respondent was Dunelm (Soft Furnishings) Limited.
The only substantive decision recorded in the written judgment is that the claimant's disability discrimination claim had no reasonable prospects of success. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No other liability findings are recorded in the written reasons provided.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy, compensation, or other monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim for disability discrimination had no reasonable prospects of success and was struck out at the hearing on 18 December 2019. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.