Miss T Chegwidden v Nuffield Health — 2023

Case reference: 2301994/2021
Decision date: 8 February 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Wright Dated

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss T Chegwidden

Respondent

Nuffield Health

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 19 January 2023 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 22 November 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. As a result, the hearing listed for 4, 5 and 6 September 2023 was vacated.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for non-compliance and lack of active pursuit. This claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category and claim-type hint rather than expressly identified in the judgment text.	Struck out	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for non-compliance and lack of active pursuit. This claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category and claim-type hint rather than expressly identified in the judgment text.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.