Case 2302099/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Pryce v Choice Support — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302099/2021
- Decision date
- 14 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Pryce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss B Pryce brought claims against Choice Support that were heard at London South on 14 October 2022 before Employment Judge Khalil sitting alone. The judgment records that the claimant’s claims for unfair dismissal contrary to sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, wrongful dismissal, and unauthorised deductions under sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were all well founded and succeeded.
The written record does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasons or any remedy assessment. It states that reasons were given at the time and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, so the public record extracted here is limited to the formal outcome of each claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.94/98 ERA 1996
- s.13/23 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.