Dr N Nguru v Maximus UK Services Limited – First Respondent Nathan Huet – Second Respondent Joseph Lloyd - Third Respondent — Employment Tribunal 2024 | Tribunal Watch

Loading…

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Preliminary judgment on an application to amend. Disability discrimination allegations, including direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect discrimination and reasonable adjustments, were permitted in part and refused in part; merits and time limits were left for later determination.	Other	Disability	—
Harassment	Preliminary judgment on an application to amend. Some harassment-related amendments were refused, some were permitted, and no final merits finding was made.	Other	Disability	—
Victimisation	Preliminary judgment on an application to amend. The tribunal recorded that one victimisation complaint would proceed to a final hearing and permitted some further victimisation amendments while refusing others.	Other	—	—
Breach of contract	The judgment records that the claimant had withdrawn the breach of contract complaint and that a separate withdrawal judgment would be issued.	Withdrawn	—	—
Other	The judgment records withdrawal of a complaint described as failure to ensure health and safety and welfare under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2010, with the claimant accepting that the tribunal had no jurisdiction.	Withdrawn	—	—
Other	The claimant sought to proceed with a detriment complaint under section 44(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal held that the wording in the Allegations Table was not a clear withdrawal, so the complaint was not treated as withdrawn and required further case management.	Other	—	—

Dr N Nguru v Maximus UK Services Limited – First Respondent Nathan Huet – Second Respondent Joseph Lloyd - Third Respondent — Employment Tribunal 2024 | Tribunal Watch