Case 2302286/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Levett v London & South Eastern Railway Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302286/2018
- Decision date
- 8 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard
- Venue
- Ashford
- Panel members
- Ms S Dengate, Mr D Newlyn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Levett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Ashford on 5 to 8 August 2019, the tribunal unanimously dismissed all three claims brought by Mr L Levett against London & South Eastern Railway Limited. The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded. It also dismissed the disability discrimination claim, which was pleaded as direct discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments, and it dismissed the direct age discrimination claim.
The extracted judgment records the outcomes only. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy award is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claim that the claimant was unfairly dismissed was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the disability discrimination claim, which is described in the judgment as including direct discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the claim of direct age discrimination. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.