Case 2302391/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Nkazi v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302391/2021
- Decision date
- 8 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith
- Venue
- Croydon
- Panel members
- Ms Boyce, Mr Harrington-Roberts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Nkazi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, a Band 2 Health Care Assistant employed by the Respondent NHS Foundation Trust since 2000, resigned with immediate effect on 28 April 2021 following a dispute about being required to move from the Bethlem site to the Lambeth site. He brought complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments (in respect of his admitted disability of prostate cancer) and constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal heard the matter over three days in July 2024 before Employment Judge Leith sitting with Ms Boyce and Mr Harrington-Roberts.
On the reasonable adjustments claim, the tribunal considered the PCP of requiring a change of work location from Bethlem to Lambeth. On the constructive unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal examined the alleged repudiatory breaches, including the 22 April 2021 meeting and the subsequent telephone call from Mr Opoku on 23 April 2021 in which dismissal was raised. The tribunal accepted as fact that the call took place but considered that reminding the Claimant of the disciplinary policy in the circumstances was not unreasonable. The tribunal also examined the delay in the disciplinary process, observing that the Claimant was absent from work for almost all of the three years between completion of the investigation in May 2018 and his resignation in April 2021.
The tribunal concluded that it could see nothing in the Respondent's treatment of the Claimant, individually or cumulatively, which was capable of breaching the implied duty of mutual trust and confidence. Both complaints accordingly failed and were dismissed. No remedy was awarded as both claims were unsuccessful.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found the complaint failed and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal complaint. Tribunal found nothing in the Respondent's treatment of the Claimant, individually or cumulatively, capable of breaching the implied duty of mutual trust and confidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Equality Act 2010 sections 20 & 21
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- implied duty of mutual trust and confidence
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.