Case 2302555/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Diru v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302555/2023
- Decision date
- 3 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms Foster-Norman, Ms Styles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Diru
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at London South on 1, 2 and 3 October 2024 before Employment Judge Burge, Ms Foster-Norman and Ms Styles. The claimant was Mr Diru and the respondent was London Ambulance Service NHS Trust.
The unanimous judgment recorded that the claimant's complaints of direct age discrimination and harassment related to age failed and were dismissed. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint of direct age discrimination failed and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records that the complaint of harassment related to age failed and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.