Case 2302566/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr William Gyepi-Garbrah v G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302566/2023
- Decision date
- 1 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr William Gyepi-Garbrah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not appear at the final hearing, which was heard at Croydon by video on 1 December 2023. The respondent was represented by Alex Clark of G4S Legal Services.
The tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend the final hearing. It also dismissed the claim under Rule 37(c) for failure to comply with tribunal directions and under Rule 37(d) because the claim had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing category identifies unfair dismissal. The judgment dismisses the claim under Rules 47 and 37 because the claimant did not attend the final hearing, failed to comply with tribunal directions, and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rules 37 and 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- Rule 47
- Rule 37(c)
- Rule 37(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.