Mr R White v Mitie Limited — 2020

Case reference: 2302616/2019
Decision date: 23 June 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Martin

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr R White

Respondent

Mitie Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 17 February 2020 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.

The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it states only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.