Case 2302641/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Thomas v Drift Bridge Garage Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302641/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 June 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr A Thomas an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d). The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying substantive claims, but it records that the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. It also recorded that the hearing fixed for 24 to 31 May 2021 would not take place. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Khalil on 4 September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive causes of action in the extracted text; it records that the claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.