Case 2302721/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Fofana v Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302721/2024
- Decision date
- 27 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Fofana
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case on 27 November 2024 at London (South) via CVP before Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer. Miss J Fofana appeared in person and Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Limited was represented by counsel.
The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim was dismissed because it was beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction. The judgment states that the claim had been brought out of time when it was reasonably practicable for it to have been brought in time.
The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was also dismissed. The Tribunal found that the complaint was not well-founded. The judgment states that none of the claimant's claims survived the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because it was beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction: the claim was brought out of time when it was reasonably practicable for it to have been brought in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.