Case 2302768/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Hannah Winter v St James Tavern Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302768/2022
- Decision date
- 11 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington Appearances
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Hannah Winter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal allowed Hannah Winter's application for interim relief. It ordered that her contract of employment with St James Tavern Limited continue in force from the date of termination, on or around 5 August 2022, until the determination or settlement of the unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to make a backdating payment of £536.75 for the period 5 August 2022 to 4 September 2022, payable no later than 8 November 2022. It also recorded that, because the claimant started alternative employment on or around 1 September 2022 at earnings above those paid by the respondent, the respondent was not required to pay an amount in respect of each normal monthly pay period until the complaint is determined or settled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment concerns the claimant's application for interim relief in connection with an unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal allowed the application and ordered a backdating payment; it did not determine the merits of the underlying unfair dismissal complaint. | Upheld | — | £537 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £537
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.