Case 2302769/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Tris Houseman v St James Tavern Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302769/2022
- Decision date
- 11 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington Appearances
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Tris Houseman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 11 October 2022 before Employment Judge Harrington, with Mr F Magennis appearing for the claimant and the respondent not in attendance, Tris Houseman’s application for interim relief was successful. The judgment records that his contract of employment with St James Tavern Limited continues in force from termination on or around 5 August 2022 until the determination or settlement of the unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal ordered that, for each normal monthly pay period until that determination or settlement, the respondent is to pay £801.60, described as the amount the claimant could reasonably have been expected to earn. It also ordered a backdating payment of £1,788.18 for the period 5 August 2022 to 11 October 2022, payable no later than 8 November 2022. The judgment does not contain a merits decision on the unfair dismissal complaint itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Interim relief application successful. The judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying unfair dismissal complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,788
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.