Case 2302770/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Lucy Rollinson-Payne v St James Tavern Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302770/2022
- Decision date
- 11 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington Appearances
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lucy Rollinson-Payne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningLucy Rollinson-Payne's application for interim relief against St James Tavern Limited was successful. Employment Judge Harrington ordered that her contract of employment continue in force from the date it ended, on or around 5 August 2022, until the determination or settlement of the unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal fixed the amount to be paid by the respondent by way of pay for each normal monthly pay period at £834.76, described as the amount the claimant could reasonably have been expected to earn. It also ordered a backdated payment of £1,862.16 covering the period from 5 August 2022 to 11 October 2022, to be paid no later than 8 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief succeeded. The tribunal ordered that the claimant's contract of employment continue in force from the date of termination, on or around 5 August 2022, until the determination or settlement of the unfair dismissal complaint. The respondent was also ordered to pay £834.76 for each normal monthly pay period. | Upheld | — | £1,862 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,862
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.